Anusha Kumar is a Dermatology physician affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital. OpenAlex indexes 34 publications with 822 citations (h-index 11).
Overview
Scholarship
indexed output and impact (OpenAlex)Distinct works indexed by OpenAlex, matched via ORCID.
Total citations across indexed works.
Hirsch index, productivity × impact (OpenAlex).
Clinical & industry
trials, payments and federal fundingContact
The practice address and phone this provider lists in the federal NPPES (CMS) registry.
Practice address
330 Brookline Ave
Boston, MA 022155400
Telephone
617-667-3753Provider last certified this registry record 4 Sept 2025.
Industry payments
11 companies reported payments to CMS in program years 2021 onward. These are public disclosures, not judgments. The latest:
- Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.Program year20253 payments
- GENZYME CORPORATIONProgram year20252 payments
- E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.Program year20252 payments
Payment records matched to this physician's NPI in CMS Open Payments, program years 2021 onward.
Publications
Matched to this physician's OpenAlex author record; most-cited works shown first.
- 73573 An Open-Label Proof of Concept Study Regarding the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in the Treatment of Keloids
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
2026 - 63547 Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Algorithm for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
2025 - Validation of a morphological hidradenitis suppurativa phenotype algorithm (HS-KAPPA)
British Journal of Dermatology
2025
Similar KOLs
Other experts from the same institution or the same specialty.
Paul Ridker, MD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Scott Solomon, MD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Dennis Selkoe, MD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Marc Pfeffer, MD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
A basic profile from our physician directory: identity and practice contact from the federal NPPES registry, research from OpenAlex, trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, payments from CMS Open Payments — shown itemized where we have matched records, as a count where we only have a total. This person hasn't been through our full identity-adjudication pipeline yet, so funding, congress activity and public presence aren't shown. Absence of a section means “not yet looked,” never “none found.”