Brett Einerson is a Gynecologic physician affiliated with University of Utah. OpenAlex indexes 199 publications with 2,090 citations (h-index 26); ClinicalTrials.gov lists 1 registered study matched to this name.
Overview
Scholarship
indexed output and impact (OpenAlex)Distinct works indexed by OpenAlex, matched via ORCID.
Total citations across indexed works.
Hirsch index, productivity × impact (OpenAlex).
Clinical & industry
trials, payments and federal fundingClinical trials
- Conservative Management for PAS Pilot
Sponsor: University of Utah
Overall officialActive, not recruitingNCT05139498
Registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov where the overall official or a site investigator name-matches this physician, confirmed against known institution/geography. Latest few shown; the full list is part of the full profile.
NIH funding
1 NIH research award on record, funded 2021–2025 per NIH RePORTER. The latest:
- Conservative management as an alternative to hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum.
Utah State Higher Education System--University of Utah
FY2025$171,720K23HD106009 - Conservative management as an alternative to hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum.
University of Utah
FY2024$171,720K23HD106009 - Conservative management as an alternative to hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum.
University of Utah
FY2023$171,720K23HD106009
Awards in the NIH RePORTER records where a principal investigator name matches this physician at an organization in their practice state. Latest award years shown; each row links to the project record on RePORTER.
Similar KOLs
Other experts from the same institution or the same specialty.
Howard Colman, MD
University of Utah
Michael Varner, MD
University of Utah
James Fang
University of Utah
Wallace Akerley, MD
University of Utah
A basic profile from our physician directory: identity and practice contact from the federal NPPES registry, research from OpenAlex, trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, payments from CMS Open Payments — shown itemized where we have matched records, as a count where we only have a total. This person hasn't been through our full identity-adjudication pipeline yet, so funding, congress activity and public presence aren't shown. Absence of a section means “not yet looked,” never “none found.”