Mitesh Parekh is a Gynecologic physician affiliated with Ohio University. OpenAlex indexes 35 publications with 833 citations (h-index 14).
Overview
Scholarship
indexed output and impact (OpenAlex)Distinct works indexed by OpenAlex.
Total citations across indexed works.
Hirsch index, productivity × impact (OpenAlex).
Clinical & industry
trials, payments and federal fundingIndustry payments
6 companies reported payments to CMS in program years 2021 onward. These are public disclosures, not judgments. The latest:
6 companies with payments on record in CMS Open Payments (2021 onward), matched to this physician's NPI. The itemized breakdown by company, amount and year is part of the full profile. Why? →
Publications
Matched to this physician's OpenAlex author record; most-cited works shown first.
- Patient Satisfaction and QoL in SUI: Results With Single-incision or Full-length Slings
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
2026 - Management of female stress urinary incontinence with single‐incision mini‐sling (Altis®): 36 month multicenter outcomes
Neurourology and Urodynamics
2023 - A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of a Single-incision Sling Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
2020 - Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion
International Urogynecology Journal
2016
Similar KOLs
Other experts from the same institution or the same specialty.
Matthew Zirwas, MD
Ohio University
Gary Cordingley, MD
Ohio University
Vineeth Sukrithan, MD
Ohio University
Ghiath Alnouri, MD
Ohio University
Baha Sibai, MD
McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston
Robert Coleman, MD
Vaniam Group
Kathleen Moore, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Bradley Monk, MD
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute
A basic profile from our physician directory: identity and practice contact from the federal NPPES registry, research from OpenAlex, trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, payments from CMS Open Payments, shown itemized where we have matched records, as a count where we only have a total. This person hasn't been through our full identity-adjudication pipeline yet, so funding, congress activity and public presence aren't shown. Absence of a section means “not yet looked,” never “none found.”