Philip Ngai is an Ophthalmology physician affiliated with University of San Diego. OpenAlex indexes 15 publications with 337 citations (h-index 8).
Overview
Scholarship
indexed output and impact (OpenAlex)Distinct works indexed by OpenAlex.
Total citations across indexed works.
Hirsch index, productivity × impact (OpenAlex).
Clinical & industry
trials, payments and federal fundingIndustry payments
4 companies reported payments to CMS in program years 2021 onward. These are public disclosures, not judgments. The latest:
4 companies with payments on record in CMS Open Payments (2021 onward), matched to this physician's NPI. The itemized breakdown by company, amount and year is part of the full profile. Why? →
Publications
Matched to this physician's OpenAlex author record; most-cited works shown first.
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Subconjunctival Injection to Direct Scleral Application of Mitomycin C in Trabeculectomy
American Journal of Ophthalmology
2020 - A randomized trial of multimedia-facilitated informed consent for cataract surgery
Clinical ophthalmology
2018 - Subconjuctival Injection Versus Direct Scleral Application of Mitomycin-C in Trabeculectomy
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
2018 - Submacular hemorrhage following cataract surgery in a patient with long axial length
New Frontiers in Ophthalmology
2017
Similar KOLs
Other experts from the same institution or the same specialty.
Victor Nizet, MD
University of San Diego
Christopher Kane, MD
University of San Diego
Lawrence Marshall, MD
University of San Diego
Lyudmila Bazhenova, MD
University of San Diego
Emily Chew, MD
National Eye Institute
Robert Weinreb, MD
University of California San Diego
Harry Quigley, MD
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Richard Spaide, MD
Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York
A basic profile from our physician directory: identity and practice contact from the federal NPPES registry, research from OpenAlex, trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, payments from CMS Open Payments, shown itemized where we have matched records, as a count where we only have a total. This person hasn't been through our full identity-adjudication pipeline yet, so funding, congress activity and public presence aren't shown. Absence of a section means “not yet looked,” never “none found.”