FindMyKOL
Clinical trialNCT02620852RecruitingInterventional

Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of Risk (Wisdom Study)

SponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoEnrollment100,000Breast CancerBreast Cancer ScreeningBreast Carcinoma in Situ
View the registry record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The lay summary the sponsor registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Most physicians still use a one-size-fits-all approach to breast screening in which all women, regardless of their personal history, family history or genetics (except BRCA carriers) are recommended to have annual mammograms starting at age 40. Mammograms benefit women by detecting cancers early when they are easier to treat, but they are not perfect. Recent news stories have discussed some of the potential harms: large numbers of positive results that cause stressful recalls for additional mammograms and biopsies. With the current screening approach, half of the women who undergo annual screening for ten years will have at least one false positive biopsy. Potentially more important are cancer diagnoses for growths that might never come to clinical attention if left alone (called "overdiagnosis"). This can lead to unnecessary treatment. Even more concerning is evidence that up to 20% of breast cancers detected today may fall into the category of "overdiagnosis." The WISDOM 1.0 study compares annual screening with a risk-based breast cancer screening schedule, based upon each woman's personal risk of breast cancer. The investigators have designed the study to be inclusive of all, so that even women who might be nervous about being randomly assigned to receive a particular type of care (a procedure that is typical in clinical studies) will still be able to participate by choosing the type of care they receive. For participants in the risk-based screening arm, each woman will receive a personal risk assessment that includes her family and medical history, breast density measurement and tests for genes (mutations and variations) linked to the development of breast cancer. Women who have the highest personal risk of developing breast cancer will receive more frequent screening, while women with a lower personal risk would receive less frequent screening. No woman will be screened less than is recommended by the USPSTF breast cancer screening guidelines. If this study is successful, women will gain a realistic understanding of their personal risk of breast cancer as well as strategies to reduce their risk, and fewer women will suffer from the anxiety of false positive mammograms and unnecessary biopsies. The investigators believe this study has the potential to transform breast cancer screening in America. Starting in Spring 2023, WISDOM's design shifted to remove the randomized option, but will continue with the preference/self-selection option for participation (WISDOM 2.0). Participants will therefore continue to choose their study arm (Personalized or Annual) rather than have the option to be randomized. This study design change was made after review of the WISDOM 1.0 data by an independent monitoring committee, which indicates that personalized screening does not cause harm. WISDOM 2.0 has also lowered the eligibility to ages 30-74. Women ages 30-39 will only be offered to join the Personalized Arm.

Investigators

The overall officials registered on this study. Names that resolve to a FindMyKOL profile link to it; the rest are shown as registered.

A profile link is shown only when the registered name resolves to a person record with a confident, namesake-checked match; ambiguous names stay unlinked.

Sites

11 registered facilities, with the per-site recruitment status where the registry publishes one. ClinicalTrials.gov does not publish per-site enrollment counts.

United States
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, United States

    Rachael Lancaster, MD
    Recruiting
  • University of California Irvine

    Irvine, California, United States

    Hoda Anton-Culver, PhD
    Recruiting
  • University of California Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, United States

    Arash Naeim, MD, PhD
    Recruiting
  • University of California Davis

    Sacramento, California, United States

    Alexander Borowsky, MD
    Recruiting
  • University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California, United States

    Barbara Parker, MDLisa Madlensky, PhDSheri Hartman, PhD
    Recruiting
  • University of California San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, United States

    Laura van 't Veer, PhD
    Recruiting
  • Topline Md Alliance

    Miami, Florida, United States

    Michael Plaza, MD
    Recruiting
  • University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, United States

    Olufunmilayo Olopade, MD
    Recruiting
  • Louisiana State University

    New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

    Active, not recruiting
  • Weill Cornell Medicine

    New York, New York, United States

    Yiwey Shieh, MD
    Recruiting
  • Edith Sanford Breast Center

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

    Active, not recruiting

Site investigator names are published by ClinicalTrials.gov only while a study recruits, so completed studies list sites without them.

Drugs studied

No drug or biological interventions are in our data for this study. It may test a procedure, device or behavioral intervention, or the intervention list isn't in our current snapshot. See the registry record ↗. Why? →

Registration & key dates

Registry attributes as recorded on the ClinicalTrials.gov study record.

Start
31 Aug 2016
Primary completion
1 Sept 2026
Completion
1 Sept 2026
Last update posted
25 Nov 2025
Registered enrollment
100,000
Registry id
NCT02620852

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, via the CTTI AACT database, data as of 24 Aug 2026. Registry facts are shown as registered by the study sponsor; FindMyKOL does not interpret them.