findmyKOL
Clinical trialNCT04523961CompletedPhase 2/PHASE3Interventional

Comparative Study of Two Topical Anesthetics Prior to Fractional Nonablative Laser Treatment of the Face

SponsorMayo ClinicEnrollment22Anesthesia, LocalPhotodamaged SkinTopical and Infiltration Anesthetic Toxicity
View the registry record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The lay summary the sponsor registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of lidocaine 2.5%/prilocaine 2.5% cream versus lidocaine 23%/tetracaine 7% ointment for topical anesthesia prior to a nonablative laser procedure.

Investigators

The overall officials registered on this study. Names that resolve to a findmyKOL profile link to it; the rest are shown as registered.

A profile link is shown only when the registered name resolves to a person record with a confident, namesake-checked match; ambiguous names stay unlinked.

Sites

1 registered facility, with the per-site recruitment status where the registry publishes one. ClinicalTrials.gov does not publish per-site enrollment counts.

United States
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona

    Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site investigator names are published by ClinicalTrials.gov only while a study recruits, so completed studies list sites without them.

Drugs studied

The drug and biological interventions registered on this study, normalized to their RxNorm ingredient where possible.

2.5 g of lidocaine 23% / tetracaine 7% ointment without occlusion7.5 g lidocaine 2.5%/ prilocaine 2.5% cream with occlusion
Linked drugs open the directory filtered to KOLs working with them.clinicaltrials.gov

Registration & key dates

Registry attributes as recorded on the ClinicalTrials.gov study record.

Start
8 Jan 2021
Primary completion
19 Feb 2025
Completion
19 Feb 2025
Last update posted
20 Feb 2026
Registered enrollment
22
Registry id
NCT04523961

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, via the CTTI AACT database, data as of 24 Aug 2026. Registry facts are shown as registered by the study sponsor; findmyKOL does not interpret them.