findmyKOL
Clinical trialNCT05959018CompletedInterventional

Efficacy & Cost Effectiveness of Antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs in CLABSI Prevention in a Malaysia Adult ICU

SponsorUniversity of MalayaEnrollment110CLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection
View the registry record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The lay summary the sponsor registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are indispensable in modern critical care. However, CVC usage is associated with complications, including central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), which in turn, is translated to higher healthcare costs and mortality. The use of antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs is one of the strategies to reduce CLABSI. Nevertheless, its' efficacy and beneficial effects, particularly in terms of patients' outcome had not been homogeneously demonstrated across literature. Moreover, antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs are more expensive compared to conventional non-impregnated ones, and hence its cost-effectiveness remains doubtful. To date, no local studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and economic impact of antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs and on patients' outcome. The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs in preventing (CLABSI) among critically ill patients in a Malaysia University Hospital Adult Intensive Care Unit. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is there any difference in CLABSI rates between patients using antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs and non-impregnated CVCs in Malaysia adult ICU? 2. Does the use of antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs in CLABSI prevention in Malaysia adult ICU affect patient length of stay when compared to non- impregnated CVCs? 3. Does the use of antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs in CLABSI prevention in the adult ICU setting affect healthcare costs when compared to non-impregnated CVCs? 4. How antimicrobial resistance features of the bacteria causing CLABSI may differ in patients using antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs compared to non-impregnated CVCs? Patients who require a CVC for critical care in ICU will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of the two different groups to receive either a conventional non-impregnated CVC or an antimicrobial-impregnated CVC, which will be inserted and handled by medical practitioners. Participants will then be monitored for symptoms and signs of CLABSI, alongside length of ICU stay \& healthcare costs. Researchers will compare CLABSI rates and other relevant parameters among the 2 groups to see if antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs are useful and cost-effective in CLABSI prevention.

Investigators

The overall officials registered on this study. Names that resolve to a findmyKOL profile link to it; the rest are shown as registered.

A profile link is shown only when the registered name resolves to a person record with a confident, namesake-checked match; ambiguous names stay unlinked.

Sites

1 registered facility, with the per-site recruitment status where the registry publishes one. ClinicalTrials.gov does not publish per-site enrollment counts.

Malaysia
  • Universiti of Malaya Medical Centre

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site investigator names are published by ClinicalTrials.gov only while a study recruits, so completed studies list sites without them.

Drugs studied

No drug or biological interventions are in our data for this study. It may test a procedure, device or behavioral intervention, or the intervention list isn't in our current snapshot. See the registry record ↗. Why? →

Registration & key dates

Registry attributes as recorded on the ClinicalTrials.gov study record.

Start
19 Jan 2024
Primary completion
3 Mar 2026
Completion
3 Mar 2026
Last update posted
14 Apr 2026
Registered enrollment
110
Registry id
NCT05959018

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, via the CTTI AACT database, data as of 24 Aug 2026. Registry facts are shown as registered by the study sponsor; findmyKOL does not interpret them.