Leah Cardwell is a Dermatology physician. OpenAlex indexes 73 publications with 902 citations (h-index 15).
Overview
Scholarship
indexed output and impact (OpenAlex)Distinct works indexed by OpenAlex, matched via ORCID.
Total citations across indexed works.
Hirsch index, productivity × impact (OpenAlex).
Clinical & industry
trials, payments and federal fundingContact
The practice address and phone this provider lists in the federal NPPES (CMS) registry.
Practice address
18652 Fairway Dr
Detroit, MI 482212279
Telephone
313-790-5469Provider last certified this registry record 8 Sept 2025.
Industry payments
24 companies reported payments to CMS in program years 2021 onward. These are public disclosures, not judgments. The latest:
- Galderma Laboratories, L.P.Program year20256 payments
- Amgen Inc.Program year20257 payments
- Janssen Biotech, Inc.Program year20256 payments
Payment records matched to this physician's NPI in CMS Open Payments, program years 2021 onward.
Publications
Matched to this physician's OpenAlex author record; most-cited works shown first.
- Internet-based survey intervention improves adherence to methotrexate among psoriasis patients
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
2022 - <scp>Post‐transplant</scp> primary cutaneous peripheral <scp>T‐cell</scp> lymphoma not otherwise specified in a pediatric patient
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
2021
Similar KOLs
Other experts from the same institution or the same specialty.
No other directory profiles share this institution yet.
Robert Modlin, MD
University of California, Los Angeles
Heidi Kong, MD
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
Jon Hanifin, MD
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)
Victoria Werth, MD
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
A basic profile from our physician directory: identity and practice contact from the federal NPPES registry, research from OpenAlex, trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, payments from CMS Open Payments, shown itemized where we have matched records, as a count where we only have a total. This person hasn't been through our full identity-adjudication pipeline yet, so funding, congress activity and public presence aren't shown. Absence of a section means “not yet looked,” never “none found.”