Scott Chudnoff is a Gynecologic physician. OpenAlex indexes 57 publications with 1,204 citations (h-index 20); ClinicalTrials.gov lists 5 registered studies matched to this name.
Overview
Scholarship
indexed output and impact (OpenAlex)Distinct works indexed by OpenAlex.
Total citations across indexed works.
Hirsch index, productivity × impact (OpenAlex).
Clinical & industry
trials, payments and federal fundingClinical trials
- Clinical Validation Study of the Eximis CS (Contained Segmentation) System
Sponsor: Eximis Surgical
Registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov where the overall official or a site investigator name-matches this physician, confirmed against known institution/geography. Latest few shown; the full list is part of the full profile.
Industry payments
4 companies reported payments to CMS in program years 2021 onward. These are public disclosures, not judgments. The latest:
4 companies with payments on record in CMS Open Payments (2021 onward), matched to this physician's NPI. The itemized breakdown by company, amount and year is part of the full profile. Why? →
Publications
Matched to this physician's OpenAlex author record; most-cited works shown first.
- P756: It takes two: An initiative to increase partner carrier screening rates
Genetics in Medicine Open
2026 - Does Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Improve Pain after Hysterectomy
JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
2025
Similar KOLs
Other experts from the same institution or the same specialty.
No other directory profiles share this institution yet.
Baha Sibai, MD
McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston
Robert Coleman, MD
Vaniam Group
Kathleen Moore, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Bradley Monk, MD
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute
A basic profile from our physician directory: identity and practice contact from the federal NPPES registry, research from OpenAlex, trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, payments from CMS Open Payments, shown itemized where we have matched records, as a count where we only have a total. This person hasn't been through our full identity-adjudication pipeline yet, so funding, congress activity and public presence aren't shown. Absence of a section means “not yet looked,” never “none found.”